skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A few years ago, remote-controlled oilfields may have sounded like a
scene from a sci-fi movie. Today, digital
oilfields make old-fashioned methods of taking a chance to strike oil and
gas a thing of the past. As such, digital
oilfields rely on IT, automation and communication to improve all aspects
of operations of the upstream oil and gas sector, from production and drilling to completion and safety. For
example, oil services firms, such as Schlumberger, are able to seamlessly link
remote drilling operations to command centers of its customers. Real-time
monitoring of onshore and offshore drilling is available to geologists and
engineers in the company’s multiple operation locations in different countries.
According to John
Brantley of IBM, incorporation of
intelligence and automation into energy operations allows the companies to
detect and preempt equipment malfunctions, automatically make changes, and
reduce the risk of equipment failure. The petroleum industry can cut the costs of both
onshore and offshore operations by 10% to 20% and increase the production
of oil by an additional 125 billion barrels of oil, if the potential
of digital oilfields is realized.
Although the oil and gas industry still
resists a shift to digitization, the market share of the digital oilfield
technology is growing, particularly with the increased complexity of petroleum
operations in geologically challenging environments and remote locations. While
digital oilfields are currently most active in Western Europe and North
America, the Middle East anticipates
rapid growth in integrating remote monitoring and control of upstream oil
and gas operations in the next ten years. According the oil and gas division of
the New York-based International Quality and Productivity Center (IQPC), a
web-based oil and gas information portal, “by 2015 the value
of digital oilfield services is projected to exceed $200 billion, an
increase of more than 405 from the 2012 market size.” At this juncture, there
is no point of return to old, uneconomical and precarious methods of petroleum
exploration and production.
Current
capabilities and best practices in digital oilfields, information and knowledge
sharing, challenges of implementing IT platforms and solutions will be the
fulcrum of IQPC's
upcoming Digital
Oilfields USA Summit in Houston, Texas, on December 10-11, 2013. It is
a unique opportunity to learn from industry practitioners on how to capitalize
on digital oilfield investments, how to leverage IT, and how reduce operating
costs and maximize oil and gas production. Common challenges in implementing IT
platforms and protecting information and operations from cyber threats will be
also covered in the summit. Speakers at the summit represent market leaders in
IT and the oil and gas sector.
The escalating conflict in Syria
and OPEC crude oil supply disruptions appear to have sent a mild panic to the
oil markets. While Syria may not be a defining factor of price jumps, oil
production cuts
from Iraq and Libya by 170,000 barrels per day (bpd), in spite of increased
output in Saudi Arabia, play a larger role. Worker protests in Libya brought
the production down to 400,000 bpd in early August. Meantime, the second
largest oil producer in OPEC with oil output exceeding 3 million bpd
(mbpd) in 2012 and 2.4 mbpd going to exports, Iraq’s oil sales in 2013 have fallen
below last year’s average, with July 2013 exports hovering at 2.25 million bpd.
With Iraq’s increasingly important role as an oil exporter in the years to come,
it is worth examining why its oil exports are on the decline and are unlikely
to make a big jump without fixing the security and infrastructure problems.
This year’s decline in Iraq’s oil exports
was largely due to the repeated insurgent attacks
on the Kirkuk-Ceyhan (Iraq-Turkey) oil pipeline as well as other infrastructure
failures. According to Iraqi officials, production disruptions due to repairs
of de-gassing stations at the country’s oldest and largest Rumaila oilfield
contributed to the recent cutbacks. Iraq plans
to increase production by 360,000 bpd by the end of 2013 or early next year
from new oil fields Majnoon, West Qurna-2 and Garraf and install three new
single point mooring platforms in the Persian Gulf for additional export
capacity.
But it is unlikely that the exports
will increase further with a planned maintenance of Iraq’s major export terminal
in the south – al-Basra Oil Terminal and Khor al-Amaya Oil terminal – which
could cut output by 500,000
bpd for four to six months from September, despite assurances of Iraqi oil
officials that disruptions would be minimal. Besides, the increase in export
capacity is subject to tanker traffic in the Gulf, weather challenges, and the
current export infrastructure taking turns between a shut-down and slow
re-starts. At the end of the day, Iraq’s antiquated and neglected energy
infrastructure is a critical obstacle to oil production and exports. This
August, Iraqi officials chided
Royal Dutch Shell for delayed start-up and for the inability to meet production
goals of 175,000 bpd from the giant
Majoon oilfield in the south. The row points to the infrastructure challenges confronting international
oil firms operating in Iraq. Shell attributed delays to health and safety
concerns, stressing that additional work was required to safeguard existing
facilities. Similar problems exist in every part of the country’s energy value
chain. Thus, Iraq’s new ambitious
production figures of 9 mbpd by 2020 and exports of 4.5 mbpd in 2014 will be further
curtailed with recurring infrastructure failures that beg for a complete renewal
of the infrastructure, and inevitably cause disruptions while renovations take
place. Constant terrorist attacks on the Kirkuk-Ceyhan export pipeline will not
help the increase of exports either.